$ loading_
Classify a proposed worker engagement — employee, IC, temp, or vendor — by running the applicable jurisdiction tests and flagging misclassification gaps between the intended arrangement and what the facts actually support. Prospective use only. Use when someone says "we want to bring on a contractor", "is this a vendor or a temp", "how should we classify this person", or describes a proposed working arrangement.
复制安装指令，让 AI 自动完成配置 · 推荐新手
请帮我安装 askskill 上的 "worker-classification" 技能： 1. 下载 https://raw.githubusercontent.com/anthropics/claude-for-legal/main/employment-legal/skills/worker-classification/SKILL.md 2. 保存为 ~/.claude/skills/worker-classification/SKILL.md 3. 装好后重载技能，告诉我可以用了
Runs the applicable classification tests for the jurisdiction and flags where the proposed arrangement doesn't match the structure you're trying to use. Prospective only — for existing relationships, consult counsel.
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/employment-legal/CLAUDE.md → jurisdictional footprint, escalation table./employment-legal:worker-classification
We want to bring on a data scientist for 6 months, working out of our
SF office, using our tools, embedded in our analytics team.
/employment-legal:worker-classification
Is our recruiter contractor arrangement okay? She works exclusively for
us, sets her own hours, uses her own laptop, project fee per placement.
/employment-legal:worker-classification
(skill will ask for details)
Matter context. Check ## Matter workspaces in the practice-level CLAUDE.md. If Enabled is ✗ (the default for in-house users), skip the rest of this paragraph — skills use practice-level context and the matter machinery is invisible. If enabled and there is no active matter, ask: "Which matter is this for? Run /employment-legal:matter-workspace switch <slug> or say practice-level." Load the active matter's matter.md for matter-specific context and overrides. Write outputs to the matter folder at ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/employment-legal/matters/<matter-slug>/. Never read another matter's files unless Cross-matter context is on.
The most expensive classification decision is the one nobody made consciously. Someone describes what they want ("a contractor"), the engagement starts, and two years later the facts look like employment. This skill walks the applicable tests on the proposed arrangement before it starts — and tells you when what you're describing doesn't match the structure you're trying to use.
This skill teaches the reasoning pattern. It does not state the law. Every test formulation, statutory citation, threshold, and carve-out must come from current research for the applicable jurisdiction.
This skill analyzes a PROPOSED engagement before the work starts. Before any substantive intake (Step 1), ask:
Has this work already started? Is the worker currently engaged, or have they been performing work under this arrangement for any period of time (days, weeks, months, or years)?
If the answer is yes — the engagement already exists, in any form, for any duration — STOP. Do not proceed to Step 1 intake. Classifying an existing arrangement is not a planning exercise; it's a liability assessment with remediation implications: back pay (OT, meal/rest premiums), unpaid employer-side payroll tax, benefits eligibility that was denied, unemployment and workers' comp back-exposure, state penalties (in CA, PAGA), IRS § 530 relief analysis, and — in strict-test jurisdictions with ongoing work — the prospective exposure of letting it run another day. That analysis is privileged, led by counsel, and coupled with a remediation plan.
Output exactly this block and wait for a response:
Out of scope — existing arrangement.
…
帮助法律诊所进行结构化客户接案访谈、分流并生成案件摘要。
安全审查并安装社区技能，展示原始说明后经用户批准再落盘
管理 Matter 工作区的创建、切换、归档与上下文隔离。
安全卸载通过 hub 安装的社区技能，并在删除前确认与记录审计日志
临时禁用或重新启用已安装社区技能，并保留其配置与文件。
根据课程笔记与案例资料搭建或扩展课程提纲骨架，帮助学生自己完成复习大纲。