$ loading_
Infringement triage across trademark, copyright, patent, and trade secret — a flag list with the factors cutting each way, not a finding. Use when assessing whether someone is infringing your IP or whether you might be infringing theirs, when a knockoff or copycat surfaces, or when deciding whether a matter is worth pursuing and how.
复制安装指令，让 AI 自动完成配置 · 推荐新手
请帮我安装 askskill 上的 "infringement-triage" 技能： 1. 下载 https://raw.githubusercontent.com/anthropics/claude-for-legal/main/ip-legal/skills/infringement-triage/SKILL.md 2. 保存为 ~/.claude/skills/infringement-triage/SKILL.md 3. 装好后重载技能，告诉我可以用了
This is a triage, not a finding of infringement or non-infringement. Infringement analysis is fact-intensive and legally complex. Acting on a triage — sending a cease-and-desist, refusing to stop, filing suit, or deciding not to — without attorney review is how companies end up on the wrong side of fee awards, Rule 11 sanctions, declaratory-judgment actions, and (for patents) treble damages.
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/ip-legal/CLAUDE.md. If it
contains [PLACEHOLDER], stop and direct to /ip-legal:cold-start-interview.fto-triage output
structure); literal + DOE; indirect + divided; invalidity defenses to
consider./ip-legal:cease-desist or the takedown via
/ip-legal:takedown. Do not draft automatically.This skill never concludes. If uncertain, flag — the attorney decides.
/ip-legal:infringement-triage "competitor launched a tool called APEXSEED in class 9 — we have APEXLEAF registered in class 9; likely confusion?"
/ip-legal:infringement-triage "former engineer took notes on our model architecture to a competitor — possible trade secret?"
/ip-legal:infringement-triage
(And the skill will ask which right and for the facts.)
The loudest guardrail in the plugin. Say this at the top of every output. Do not drop it. Do not soften it.
This is a triage, not a finding of infringement or non-infringement. Infringement analysis is fact-intensive and legally complex. The triage identifies the factors and flags the ones that matter most; it does not conclude. A conclusion that something does or does not infringe is a legal opinion that requires an attorney's judgment on the facts, the claim or right scope, the relevant jurisdiction's law, and the likely defenses. Acting on a triage — sending a cease-and-desist, refusing to stop, filing suit, or deciding not to — without attorney review is how companies end up on the wrong side of fee awards, Rule 11 sanctions, declaratory-judgment actions, and (for patents) treble damages.
Under-calling a conflict is a one-way door — a C&D not sent and a mark goes generic in the market; a claim not chased and the statute of limitations runs; a copied copyrighted work kept on the site. Over-calling is a two-way door — the attorney narrows. Stay on the two-way door side.
…
Diff a proposed handbook change against the current version, flag ripple effects and state supplement impacts. Use when user says "update the handbook", "add this to the handbook", "handbook change", or has a policy ready for insertion.
Review an offer letter and any restrictive covenants — jurisdiction check included. Substantive rules (covenant enforceability, pay-transparency, salary-history limits, exemption criteria) are researched per hire, not stored. Use when the user says "review this offer", "can we use a non-compete here", "check this offer letter", "hiring in [state]", or attaches an offer.
Draft an audience-specific summary from the privileged investigation memo — HR, leadership, or outside counsel versions. Use when an investigation memo needs to be communicated to an audience that should not see the full privileged work product.
Track the IP portfolio — registrations, renewals, maintenance fees, and use declarations. Use when checking what's renewing, adding or updating an asset, recording a maintenance filing, or auditing the register for gaps, lapses, and use-in-commerce questions. Receives handoffs from prosecution and clearance work.
IRAC-scaffolded case analysis memo with research gaps flagged — the scaffold, not the analysis. Rule blocks are RESEARCH NEEDED, Application is STUDENT ANALYSIS prompts, Conclusion is blank. Use when a student needs to scaffold a case analysis memo, write up their analysis, or build an IRAC memo for a case.
Read VDR documents and extract issues per house categories and materiality thresholds, producing findings in house memo format. Use when user says "review the data room", "extract issues from [folder]", "diligence review", "what's in the VDR", or points at VDR documents.