ai.seaotter/otterscore

Evaluate this AI customer support reply against the following acceptance policy: it must accurately explain the refund policy, remain polite, avoid invented terms, and provide next steps. Score each criterion, identify failures, and give a final pass/fail verdict. Reply: {{agent_output}}

A strict evaluation with criterion scores, issue notes, and a final pass/fail decision.

Act as a hostile-by-default reviewer and check this AI-generated code explanation and patch against the acceptance criteria: it must meet requirements, preserve existing interfaces, cover edge cases, and avoid obvious security risks. Output detailed deduction reasons and improvement suggestions. Content: {{agent_output}}

A strict review report for the code output with risks, scoring rationale, and fixes.

Score this AI research summary using the following acceptance policy: it must stay faithful to the source conclusions, note uncertainty, avoid overstating evidence, and be clear for executives. Return a total score, category assessments, key defects, and whether you recommend using it. Summary: {{agent_output}}

A validation result for research or product teams that clearly states usability and defects.