Evaluate vendors with cost, risk, and recommendation analysis for procurement decisions.
Copy the install command and let the AI configure it · recommended for beginners
Please install the "vendor-review" skill from askskill: 1. Download https://raw.githubusercontent.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins/main/operations/skills/vendor-review/SKILL.md 2. Save it as ~/.claude/skills/vendor-review/SKILL.md 3. Reload skills and tell me it's ready
Please evaluate this new vendor proposal by analyzing pricing, service scope, implementation timeline, compliance risk, supply stability, and hidden costs, then provide a recommendation on whether it should move forward in procurement with reasons.
A structured vendor review with pros, cons, key risks, and a procurement recommendation.
Please compare Vendor A and Vendor B side by side, scoring them on total cost of ownership, contract flexibility, service levels, integration difficulty, risk exposure, and long-term scalability, and explain which one is recommended.
A scored comparison table with a clear recommendation and supporting rationale.
We are deciding whether to renew our current vendor. Based on the existing contract, usage, and pricing details, break down the 3-year total cost of ownership, identify negotiable items, service redundancies, and replacement risks, and produce renewal negotiation points.
A renewal analysis report with TCO breakdown, renewal vs. replacement risks, and negotiation points.
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Evaluate a vendor with structured analysis covering cost, risk, performance, and fit.
/vendor-review $ARGUMENTS
When comparing vendors, produce a side-by-side matrix covering: pricing, features, integrations, security, support, contract terms, and references.
## Vendor Review: [Vendor Name]
**Date:** [Date] | **Type:** [New / Renewal / Comparison]
### Summary
[2-3 sentence recommendation]
### Cost Analysis
| Component | Annual Cost | Notes |
|-----------|-------------|-------|
| License/subscription | $[X] | [Per seat, flat, usage-based] |
| Implementation | $[X] | [One-time] |
| Support/maintenance | $[X] | [Included or add-on] |
| **Total Year 1** | **$[X]** | |
| **Total 3-Year** | **$[X]** | |
### Risk Assessment
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
|------|-----------|--------|------------|
| [Risk] | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low | [Mitigation] |
### Strengths
- [Strength 1]
- [Strength 2]
### Concerns
- [Concern 1]
- [Concern 2]
### Recommendation
[Proceed / Negotiate / Pass] — [Reasoning]
### Negotiation Points
- [Leverage point 1]
- [Leverage point 2]
If ~~knowledge base is connected:
If ~~procurement is connected:
Review an analysis for methodology, accuracy, bias, and evidence support.
Generate people analytics reports on headcount, attrition, diversity, and org health.
Identify, categorize, and prioritize technical debt for smarter refactoring decisions.
Choose the right Zoom surface for a product use case with clear tradeoffs.
Turn an approved brief into social assets, copy, and a staged campaign.
Create stakeholder updates tailored to audience, cadence, and communication goals.
Consolidate vendor agreement status, gaps, and key deadlines across connected systems.
Review contracts against playbooks with redlines, deviation flags, and impact analysis.
Review product metrics, spot trends, and get actionable improvement recommendations.
Review pipeline health, surface risks, and plan weekly deal priorities.
Search dealership vendors, compare scores, and find benchmarked alternatives.
Review code or branches for correctness, compatibility, architecture, tests, performance, and security.