Comparable Company Analysis

⚠️ CRITICAL: Data Source Priority (READ FIRST)

ALWAYS follow this data source hierarchy:

1. FIRST: Check for MCP data sources - If S&P Kensho MCP, FactSet MCP, or Daloopa MCP are available, use them exclusively for financial and trading information
2. DO NOT use web search if the above MCP data sources are available
3. ONLY if MCPs are unavailable: Then use Bloomberg Terminal, SEC EDGAR filings, or other institutional sources
4. NEVER use web search as a primary data source - it lacks the accuracy, audit trails, and reliability required for institutional-grade analysis

Why this matters: MCP sources provide verified, institutional-grade data with proper citations. Web search results can be outdated, inaccurate, or unreliable for financial analysis.

Overview

This skill teaches Claude to build institutional-grade comparable company analyses that combine operating metrics, valuation multiples, and statistical benchmarking. The output is a structured Excel/spreadsheet that enables informed investment decisions through peer comparison.

Reference Material & Contextualization:

An example comparable company analysis is provided in examples/comps_example.xlsx. When using this or other example files in this skill directory, use them intelligently:

DO use examples for:

• Understanding structural hierarchy (how sections flow)
• Grasping the level of rigor expected (statistical depth, documentation standards)
• Learning principles (clear headers, transparent formulas, audit trails)

DO NOT use examples for:

• Exact reproduction of format or metrics
• Copying layout without considering context
• Applying the same visual style regardless of audience

ALWAYS ask yourself first:

1. "Do you have a preferred format or should I adapt the template style?"
2. "Who is the audience?" (Investment committee, board presentation, quick reference, detailed memo)
3. "What's the key question?" (Valuation, growth analysis, competitive positioning, efficiency)
4. "What's the context?" (M&A evaluation, investment decision, sector benchmarking, performance review)

Adapt based on specifics:

• Industry context: Big tech mega-caps need different metrics than emerging SaaS startups
• Sector-specific needs: Add relevant metrics early (e.g., cloud ARR, enterprise customers, developer ecosystem for tech)
• Company familiarity: Well-known companies may need less background, more focus on delta analysis
• Decision type: M&A requires different emphasis than ongoing portfolio monitoring

Core principle: Use template principles (clear structure, statistical rigor, transparent formulas) but vary execution based on context. The goal is institutional-quality analysis, not institutional-looking templates.

User-provided examples and explicit preferences always take precedence over defaults.

Core Philosophy

"Build the right structure first, then let the data tell the story."

Start with headers that force strategic thinking about what matters, input clean data, build transparent formulas, and let statistics emerge automatically. A good comp should be immediately readable by someone who didn't build it.

⚠️ CRITICAL: Formulas Over Hardcodes + Step-by-Step Verification

Environment — Office JS vs Python:

• If running inside Excel (Office Add-in / Office JS): Use Office JS directly (Excel.run(async (context) => {...})). Write formulas via range.formulas = [["=E7/C7"]], not range.values. No separate recalc step — Excel handles it natively. Use range.format.* for colors/fonts.
• If generating a standalone .xlsx file: Use Python/openpyxl. Write cell.value = "=E7/C7" (formula string).
• Same principles either way — just translate the API calls.

…