doings-evidence-mcp

Assess evidence behind org design and leadership claims, and suggest safer wording.

Source

third_party_registry

Updated

2026-09-24

// securityCaution

Runs locally
Open source

Running security audit…

Credentials
Network egress
Code execution
Data access
Supply chain

// install

Copy the install command and let the AI configure it · recommended for beginners

No copy-paste install info for "doings-evidence-mcp" yet — see the docs or source repo.

// examples

Review consulting report claims

Prompt

Please review the following report section about organization design and leadership transformation. Identify claims that are weakly evidenced, overgeneralized, or hard to verify, and provide more cautious rewrites:

[paste passage]

Expected

A list of problematic claims, risk notes, and safer rewritten versions.

Check research support level

Prompt

Do the following statements have reliable research support? Classify each as "strong evidence," "limited evidence," or "unsupported," and explain why:
1. Flat organizations always improve innovation efficiency
2. Leadership training usually directly improves business performance
3. More frequent change communication is always better

Expected

Evidence ratings for each claim, with reasoning and notes on scope or limitations.

Generate safer phrasing

Prompt

Rewrite the following absolute statement into a more cautious version suitable for external use. Keep the core idea, but avoid overstating impact and clarify conditions:

"Our transformation approach will significantly improve performance across all teams and quickly eliminate collaboration inefficiencies."

Expected

One or more cautious, compliant rewrites suitable for formal external messaging.