$ loading_
Compare packaged satisfaction and NPS trends to identify declining accounts.
Copy the install command and let the AI configure it · recommended for beginners
Please install the "client-satisfaction-trend" skill from askskill: 1. Download https://raw.githubusercontent.com/microsoft/aibast-agents-library/main/solutions/client-health-score/manual/skills/satisfaction-trend/SKILL.md 2. Save it as ~/.claude/skills/satisfaction-trend/SKILL.md 3. Reload skills and tell me it's ready
Please compare the packaged four quarterly client satisfaction scores and NPS, list the accounts with declining satisfaction, and state the fixed point change for each. Also note that the survey history is synthetic and must be validated before any client action.
A list of declining accounts with quarterly trend, point changes, and a note that the synthetic data must be validated.
Using the packaged four-quarter satisfaction history and NPS, write a short summary of the overall trend and name any declining accounts with their exact point changes.
A report-ready trend summary highlighting overall changes and declining accounts.
Analysts or client teams can use it to quickly review four quarters of satisfaction and NPS trends and spot declining accounts. It is suitable for internal warning, but results should be validated before client decisions.
When preparing a quarterly review, teams can use it to summarize packaged satisfaction history and point out which accounts declined and by how many points. Because the survey history is synthetic, it is better suited for demos or method validation.
The documentation describes a skill that compares four packaged quarterly client satisfaction scores and NPS to identify declining accounts and report the fixed point change. It also emphasizes that the survey history is synthetic, so the results are suitable for demonstration or preliminary analysis only and must be validated before any client-facing action.
Use only the four packaged quarterly scores and NPS. Name declining accounts and the fixed point change. State that the survey history is synthetic and must be validated before client action.
It compares packaged four-quarter client satisfaction scores and NPS trends, then names declining accounts and their point changes. The docs also require clearly stating that the survey history is synthetic.
No. The documentation explicitly says the survey history is synthetic and must be validated before any client action.
According to the docs, it uses only the packaged four quarterly scores and NPS. For more details, see the source repository.
Checks claim-file readiness and compiles evidence for human review.
Analyze client engagement signals across meetings, escalations, billing, and utilization.
Triages fictional insurance claims and summarizes key intake details and priority.
Compare incentive options by synthetic cost, modeled lift, and net value.
Estimate policy-term settlement, coverage limits, and deductibles for claims processing.
Segment a fictional client portfolio and visualize health and churn indicators.
Aggregate customer feedback into theme insights and weekly action priorities.
Get instant natural-language client health insights and identify risky course accounts.
Review product metrics, spot trends, and get actionable improvement recommendations.
Build fictional stakeholder maps and approval-gated executive engagement plans.
Query and analyze customer feedback themes, suggestions, tags, and sentiment trends.
Prioritize churn reviews with transparent evidence and suggested next steps.