$ loading_
将模糊或高风险的产品与工程变更梳理为可验证验收标准与实施要求
复制安装指令，让 AI 自动完成配置 · 推荐新手
请帮我安装 askskill 上的 "intent-driven-development" 技能： 1. 下载 https://raw.githubusercontent.com/affaan-m/ECC/main/skills/intent-driven-development/SKILL.md 2. 保存为 ~/.claude/skills/intent-driven-development/SKILL.md 3. 装好后重载技能，告诉我可以用了
请把“为团队项目新增基于角色的权限管理”整理成可执行需求文档，列出范围、非范围、关键用户故事、验收标准、边界情况和需要澄清的问题。
一份结构化需求说明，包含清晰范围、可测试验收标准、异常场景与待确认事项。
我们要把用户资料从旧数据库迁移到新 schema，请先不要写代码，帮我定义迁移目标、成功标准、回滚条件、数据校验规则、风险点和上线前检查清单。
一套迁移实施前规范，帮助团队在执行前明确验证方式、失败处理和上线门槛。
把“接入第三方支付并支持失败重试”拆成适合交给编码代理执行的说明，输出背景、约束、接口契约、验收测试、监控需求和不应做的事情。
一份适合交接的实施规格，减少误解并让后续开发与测试可直接执行。
Produce useful acceptance criteria without turning specification into ceremony. Inspect available context first, expose genuine ambiguity, and choose verification methods that fit the work and its risk.
/intent-driven-developmentDo not activate for trivial edits, straightforward one-line fixes, active debugging sessions, code review requests, or implementation requests whose acceptance conditions are already clear.
[revised], updates scope or verification method, increments the revision number, and re-presents only the changed criteriaQuick Capture — "Add CSV export to the dashboard"
Goal: Authenticated users can download dashboard data as a CSV file.
In scope: Export of currently filtered rows; filename includes date.
Out of scope: Scheduled exports, email delivery, Excel format.
Assumptions: Max row count is under 10k; no PII in exported fields.
AC-001: Export generates file with correct headers
- Scenario: authenticated user, at least one data row visible
- Action: click "Export CSV"
- Expected: browser downloads file with columns [id, name, created_at]
- Must not: expose internal fields or rows belonging to other users
- Verification: automated integration test + manual schema spot-check
- Priority: Required
Full Acceptance Brief trigger — "Migrate user auth to OAuth"
Auth change + external dependency + existing session data → Full Brief with Risk Review table, blocking decisions on session invalidation strategy, and explicit rollback AC.
Existing spec review — user pastes a PRD
Skill reviews it for missing scope boundaries, unverifiable requirements ("the system shall be fast"), and silent assumptions, then returns corrected or supplemental criteria without restarting discovery.
…
通过双评审智能体对结果进行对抗式校验，提升输出发布前的可靠性
调用多模型交叉审查代码变更、PR与高风险修改，辅助发现缺陷与争议点